Not P but Moby-Dick (33)
David Morris
fqmorris at gmail.com
Sat Oct 28 22:41:51 UTC 2023
I guess I am thinking more experiencial than anything else. And the grammar
invites the “both@ reading, if not the author
On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 5:19 PM Ian Livingston <igrlivingston at gmail.com>
wrote:
> It is consistent with Melville's style.
>
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 12:38 PM David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What kind of safety do you find in that assumption?
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 3:13 PM <jbloocher at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > The English says both, but we could safely assume Melville is talking
>> > about the abandoned boat.
>> >
>> --
>> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
>>
>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list