CoL49 Reading Group Calendar

Sun Apr 14 15:54:17 UTC 2024

Good move James, and thanks for doing this. I have already said this but my vote is for 10pg/week. I also want to say that my suggestion about summaries was just that, a suggestion. Each week's guide/question maker/  generally handles this as they see fit. There are many summaries online as COL 49 is one of the most studied books around. One can always use one of those for a guide or your summary ( best with acknowledgement, methinks) 

> On Apr 13, 2024, at 2:27 PM, J K Van Nort via Pynchon-l <pynchon-l at waste.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSc0UEJFXfaU6VHlwTh_3QM8t_BbDNZ13IVfg1nLEMwQnAmztg/viewform?usp=sf_link 
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> 
> 
> On Saturday, April 13, 2024, 14:25, J K Van Nort via Pynchon-l <pynchon-l at waste.org> wrote:
> 
> If the first link doesn’t work for the survey, try this one.
> CoL49 Group Read Calendar choice 
>   
> |  
> |  
> |  
> |  |    |
> 
>   |
> 
>   |
> |  
> |    |  
> CoL49 Group Read Calendar choice
> 
> Choosing how many pages we will read.
>   |  |
> 
>   |
> 
>   |
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> 
> 
> On Saturday, April 13, 2024, 11:06, J K Van Nort via Pynchon-l <pynchon-l at waste.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Greetings:
> 
> 
> So I’m taking charge and carrying out the plan. Using David’s calendar plan for 5 days. a is the 182pg edition; b is the 153pg edition. I’ve developed it for both 5-6pgs and 10-11pgs a week. We can take a poll to decide which calendar to use. I created a google form to identify which calendar is preferred by the majority of us. Joseph and Richard, I added you to week 5 and 6 respectively. The 182pg edition I estimated based on the pynchonwiki, which has both but is inconsistent about the numbering.
> 
> 
> The link for the google form is https://forms.gle/zzyukKVpbZEtVpQT7. I’m not collecting names, just email addresses so we know who wants to host and when. After we vote, I’ll update the calendar according to what people request and which calendar we choose.
> 
> 
> CHAPTER 1:
> 
> 
> 4/28:  a9-15, b1-6.   James
> 
> 
> 5/5:  a16-22, b7-12.   Mark
> 
> 
> CHAPTER 2:
> 
> 
> 5/12:  a23-29; b13-18.   David
> 
> 
> 5/19:  a30-35; b19-23.   Michael
> 
> 
> 5/26:  a36-43; b24-30    Joseph
> 
> 
> CHAPTER 3:
> 
> 
> 6/2:  a44-50; b31-36   Richard
> 
> 
>  6/9:  a51-56; b37-41
> 
> 
> 6/16:  a57-64; b42-48
> 
> 
> 6/23:  a65-73; b49-57
> 
> 
> 6/30:   a74-80; b58-63
> 
> 
> CHAPTER 4:
> 
> 
> 7/7:  a81-86; b64-69
> 
> 
> 7/14: a87-92; b70-74
> 
> 
> 7/21: a93-100; b75-79
> 
> 
> CHAPTER 5:
> 
> 
> 7/28:  a101-105; b80-85
> 
> 
> 8/4:  a106-113; b86-91
> 
> 
> 8/11:  a114-119 ; b92-97  
> 
> 
> 8/18:  a120-126; b98-103
> 
> 
> 8/25:  a127-134; b104-110
> 
> 
> 9/1:  a135-140; b111-115
> 
> 
> 9/8:  a141-146; b116-119
> 
> 
> CHAPTER 6:
> 
> 
> 9/15:  a147-152; b120-126
> 
> 
> 9/22:  a153-158; b127-132
> 
> 
> 9/29:  a159-165; b133-138
> 
> 
> 10/6:  a166-172; b139-143
> 
> 
> 10/13:  a173-177; b144-148
> 
> 
> 10/20:  a178-183; b149-152 
> 
> 
> Using David’s plan, but extending it to 10 pages per week.
> 
> CHAPTER 1:
> 
> 
> 4/28:  a9-22/b1-12.   James
> 
> 
> CHAPTER 2:
> 
> 
> 5/5:  a23-33; b13-22.   Mark
> 
> 
> 5/12:  a33-46; b23-30. David
> 
> 
> CHAPTER 3:
> 
> 
> 5/19:  a47-56; b31-41   Michael
> 
> 
> 5/26:  a57-68; b42-52   Joseph
> 
> 
> 6/2:  a68-80; b52-63    Richard
> 
> 
> CHAPTER 4:
> 
> 
> 6/9:  a81-89; b64-71
> 
> 
> 6/16:  a93-100; b72-79
> 
> 
> CHAPTER 5:
> 
> 
> 6/23:  a101-112; b80-90
> 
> 
> 6/30:   a113-125; b91-101
> 
> 
> 7/7:  a126-138; b102-112
> 
> 
> 7/14:  a139-146; b113-119
> 
> 
> CHAPTER 6:
> 
> 
> 7/21:  a147-157; b120-30
> 
> 
> 7/28:  a158-168; b131-141
> 
> 
> 8/4:  a169-183; b142-152
> 
> 
> I hope this formats as I've created it. I will try to create a spreadsheet or graph once we agree on the calendar.
> In solidarity,
> James
> 
> ____________________________________________
> WARNING:  The National Security Agency is likely recording  and storing this communication as part of its unlawful spying programs on all Americans.  Mass surveillance doesn’t keep us safe, and even the top national security experts say that we don’t need it.  This communication – and any responses – can and will be used against the American people at any time in the future should folks in government decide to go after us for political reasons.   And private information in digital communications may be given to big companies by the government.
> --
> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l