ST Reviews

[Mark Kohut]

Publisher’s Weekly is not considered a review for the public. Only book
people and and booksellers  really read it… and few are negative and are
anonymous so not considered objective.

On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 10:03 AM rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com> wrote:

> earliest i found was Publisher's Weekly in Aug 2013 (granted not a full
> review)
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:55 AM Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Earliest BE review was two weeks before publication date, Sept 17.
>> (constitution day, another insight of Tom’s I might argue) ..another major
>> one a week out..
>>
>> Publishers work very Hard to prevent early reviews.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:44 AM rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I suspect we'll be seeing reviews in a couple of weeks? BE reviews
>>> emerged
>>> about a month before publication, in Aug 2013 I believe. just a guess
>>>
>>> rich
>>
>>
>>> --
>>> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
>>>
>>