BOUNCE pynchon-l at sfu.ca: Admin request

[owner-pynchon-l at sfu.ca]

>From owner-pynchon-l Mon Mar 27 21:51:41 1995
Received: from whistler.sfu.ca (root at whistler.sfu.ca [142.58.103.1]) by ferrari.sfu.ca with ESMTP (8.6.11/SFU-2.6H)
  id VAA28664 for <pynchon-l at ferrari.sfu.ca> (from owner-pynchon-l at sfu.ca); Mon, 27 Mar 1995 21:51:40 -0800
Return-Path: <owner-pynchon-l at sfu.ca>
Received: from mail06.mail.aol.com (mail06.mail.aol.com [152.163.172.108]) by whistler.sfu.ca with ESMTP (8.6.11/SFU-2.6H)
  id VAA02125 for <pynchon-l at sfu.ca> (from Orlowsky at aol.com); Mon, 27 Mar 1995 21:50:09 -0800
From: <Orlowsky at aol.com>
Received: by mail06.mail.aol.com
	(1.37.109.11/16.2) id AA249359797; Tue, 28 Mar 1995 00:49:57 -0500
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 1995 00:49:57 -0500
Message-Id: <950328004956_63435619 at aol.com>
To: mwilkes at inet.ed.gov, pynchon-l at sfu.ca
Subject: Tinasky/Pynchon

For more on the alleged Tinasky/Pynchon connection, see the San Francisco
Examiner, "Stalking Pynchon Up in Vineland," by Burr Snider, March 25, 1990,
pp. A1, A20.  Has anybody actually read any of these letters to the editor?
 I've been curious, but not enough to dig up old issues of the Anderson
Valley Advertiser, even though an old roommate of mine used to subscribe, and
it does seems like the type of hippie-activist paper Pynchon would find worth
reading.

Bob