Pynchon - a product of his times redux
LBernier at tribune.com
LBernier at tribune.com
Mon Dec 2 14:15:22 CST 1996
Hey all - I was watching M*A*S*H (the Robert Altman movie, not the TV
show) over this past weekend, and I couldn't help but think of the
recent discussion over whether Pynchon was writing under the
prejudices of his time, re: homosexuality, misogyny, racism, etc. My
conclusion was, that yes, he was. M*A*S*H could never be made today.
Why? Well, let's see, you've got WAY too much boozing, pot-smoking
and unclean living, the nurses are only there to be chased around and
otherwise harassed by the doctors, the only black character in the
movie is nicknamed "Spearchucker" and goddamn if it doesn't commit the
ultimate sin in the eyes of America, it actually corrupts the
god-given game of football into a stoned, cheating travesty!!
Most of which is meant ironically (the Spearchucker gag, and the
absolute brilliance of using a football game to send up the war
complex) but the sexism and the pat response to homosexuality (they
have a nurse "do" the guy whose going to off himself because he's gay,
and, hey, presto, he's cured!) are real, and are IMHO most definitely
reflections of the prevailing attitude at the time, even among the
couterculture. I'm not sure that the 60's generation (help me out, ye
p-listers of a certain age) would have really identified it AS sexism,
since they were too busy freeing mankind THROUGH sex to question
gender roles as such, except for those artsy-fartsies hanging out in
Manhattan with Edie and Andy. The 60's attitude seems to be a great
grok on the fact that the women could actually now RESPOND to the
men's leering overtures and slap and tickle fantasies with their own
lusty libidos. It wasn't until the 70's, with the rise of modern
feminism, that that behavior was identified with oppressiveness viz a
viz the objectification of women.
Just some thoughts.
Jean.
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list