Ectoplasm

[Paul Mackin]

> From: Henry M <gravity at nicom.com> (concerning the Counterforce)
 
> FWIW, I don't see this fab four as really being against anything in
> particular, anything you could give a name to. Nor do they seek
> followers, i.e. they aren't dogmatic machines, but are instead organic
> individuals. All this in contrast to AH (no, not Hitchcock) and to the
> fab four's deliberately unspecified enemies. I would guess that those
> enemies would be both more general, such as "control," and specific,
> such as a "bad guy."

Yes, I agree. THAT element is basic.

Capitalism qua capitalism was never the issue.

Not exactly a pretext either.

More like a . . . (er, I can't remember).

Anyway, it's the existential predicament that awes us.

Just checking to see if you were paying attention, Henry. :-)
				
					P.