milk and pee

[stencil at bcn.net]

>
>Diana York Blaine <dyb0001 at jove.acs.unt.edu> posits
>
>[...].  Finally, the big question
>pertains to why this country full of yahoos who eschew art and art museums
>(and not because these insititutions are painfully racist, sexist,
>classist and homophobic, though they are) can get it up to worry about
>something like Piss Christ.  They never would have seen it anyway.  Most
>of you probably haven't.  [...]
>
Because they were being told to pay for it, sight unseen. The NEA
appropriation was the topic, and the perception is that when the
composition of that board of bureaucratic Lorenzos changes, we could
be subsidizing a Larry Flynt.  Sauce for the houynhnm.  The money
could be better used, say for George Lincoln's Day ceremonies in
Piggly Wiggly parking lots, with latex handshakes between the NRA and
the Gay Alliance.

...just occurred, could any ArtHist testify to the detected use of
body fluids or proteins in making the Shroud of Turin?