On this Day, everyday

[MASCARO at humnet.ucla.edu]

Murthy wonders if we're voting and in wondering, does so.  I like language used that way.  
Since he's broken the ice, w/ all due respect to Henry (whose posts are usually beam on, 
though I'm wondering about that corporate river cruise, old man), I'd vote *no* also.  No 
need to go into it, they just get in the way oftimes.  A-and don't be rude to Johnny the 
K.--man has connections we haven't begun to intuit yet. 

john m



Murthy writes:
<snip>

>Now, on the subject of whether it's particularly exciting to have a bit
>of selected and condensed Reader's Digest History on the list everyday,
>if someone is taking a vote, I have to vote No (unless the items have
>some kind of a general connection to Our Obsession - I know, you're
>going to say what doesn't?).  If you're going to forward some list you
>get from some other list everyday, you might as well subscribe pynchon-l
>to that list and be done with it. There are a lot of fine mailing lists
>out there that we all might be interested in, but there is a reason why
>they're all not just one big mailing list. Posting a pointer to them
>should give us enough to go on.
>
>IMHO and look, no hamsters in _my_ pants!
>
>Murthy
>
>-- 
>Murthy Yenamandra, Dept of CompSci, U of Minnesota. mailto:yenamand at cs.umn.edu
>"A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature
>replaces it with."  -- Tenessee Williams
>