credibility of Jules' reports

[Doug Millison]

Sorry, Meg, but I'll continue to point it out when Jules or anybody else
tries to establish as historical fact what amount to defamatory,
uncorroborated slurs. We argue about far less on this list.

Cordially,
Doug

At 12:53 PM 7/17/97, Meg Larson wrote:
>Ferchrissakes--either take it off-list or DROP IT!!!  Quite rudely and
>quite frankly--I don't care if Jules or Chrissie are/aren't lying or if
>what Jules reports is/isn't uncorroborated.  What's really starting to piss
>me off is that this Doug-Jules-sometimes PG-debate has been going on,
>ONLIST, for too long.  A-and during MY section of the MDMD no less!
>
>Jules is correct in at least one respect, Doug--this ain't a trial, so
>fucking drop it!
>
>Please???
>
>Thank you, Eric A W, for picking up the lurking ball and trying to take it
>somewhere.
>
>I love you guys, but some days I'd rather just shoot you and put me and
>this list out of it's misery,
>
>Meg
>
>Direct all flames to:
>mgl at tardis.svsu.edu
>----------
>> From: Doug Millison <millison at online-journalist.com>
>> To: jsiegel at mail.caribe.net.mx; pynchon-l at waste.org
>> Subject: Re: credibility of Jules' reports
>> Date: Thursday, July 17, 1997 1:20 PM
>>
>> Neither your bluster nor your journalistic credentials change the fact
>that
><snipped it; less drastic than slitting my wrists>


D O U G  M I L L I S O N ||||||||||| millison at online-journalist.com