The future of the list -- nanny time?

[calbert at pop.tiac.net]

Vaska,
Two points.
I)Though I may have blown a tad hard, I thought the hyperbole 
obvious. I don't believe that taking issue with your premise 
is patronizing, but I am certain that reducing my argument to an 
outburst of "male ego" qualifies as condescending.
II)You are more than equal to the task and don't need DYB to carry 
your standard.(I feel gelded at the very prospect.)

My only participation in the gender war is to strive to promote equal 
opportunity while insuring that the debate about what inhibits it 
remains honest. I fail to understand why people communicating with 
others whom they may never have seen would contribute to an 
atmosphere of distaff supression.
love,
cfa

> Charles's "so speaketh a male ego" post [it misses the point to merely
> patronize me, Charles] deserves a Diana York Blaine to handle.  But DYB has
> been either silent or absent for months....