Blankets

[Doug Millison]

I'll continue to use the DELETE button as it was intended, but I offer a
humble suggestion that you two might want to take this discussion off-line.

Cordially,
Doug

At 3:55 PM 6/6/97, Matthew P Wiener wrote:
>David Casseres wrote:
>
>>Matthew Weiner sez
>
>>>And I am not doing that whatsoever.  Sheesh.  Meanwhile, the song remains
>>>baldly inaccurate, historywise.  Deal with it, eh?  Scrambling to find
>>>*somewhere* a positive spin *somehow* on its historical contents is not
>>>going to work.
>
>>[...] the song is neither corroborated nor contradicted by history,
>>so how the hell can it be "baldly inaccurate, historywise"?  History
>>does not say anything at all about the song.
>
>I listed numerous features of the song that were grossly inaccurate so
>far as history goes.  You keep pretending I did not.
>
>>>  on the money.  The guts of the song are indeed baldly inaccurate, as I
>>>showed with point by point enumeration of its disconnection from reality.
>
>>You showed nothing but a lack of written documentation,
>
>Liar.
>
>>>You may bother to note that most of the historical errors had nothing to
>>>do with the blankets before lying your head off about what I did or did
>>>not "try to pass off".
>
>>There are no "historical errors" to note.
>
>I noted many.  The only attempts to refute me were pretty ridiculous, like
>claiming "the West" did not mean "the West", and so on.
>
>>                                           Do not call me a liar;
>
>Then stop lying.  Duh.
>
>>                                                                  you did
>>indeed try to pass off a lack of evidence as contradictory evidence, and
>>you are still doing so.
>
>You're lying again.  I did not try to pass anything off, for one thing.
>--
>-Matthew P Wiener (weemba at sagi.wistar.upenn.edu)    If Apple owned
> NBC, they would sue Nike for comedy-interface copyright violation.

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
D O U G  M I L L I S O N>>>>millison at online-journalist.com