GRGR(16) non-verbal spaces

[Josh Kortbein]

"Terrance F. Flaherty" writes:
>But what is in the Novel V.? That's what I'm talking about
>here. Not my interpretation of Wittgenstein.  I wrote: 

Just reaffirming Peter's point, that such an interpretation
definitely seems contrary to W.

What's the page number for this in _V._? Sorry if I missed
it before, just coming down off my last final and I've been
skimming the list mail lightly.

>In the mirror, in the vouyeur's dreams (vouyeur's dreams are
>not their own) Weissman visits him during sickness and
>declares that HE HAS INTERPRETED the sferics, "Die Welt ist
>Alles Was der Fall ist" the facts, the amoral facts of the
>Seige Party--a wild Fasching, with murder and sadism. 
>
>My comments are not about Wittgenstein, but I will indulge
>you if you care to discuss him, though I have not read him
>well, too boring, and even with the companion, I found he
>gave me a pain behind the eyes. 

A pity, I've never had more fun doing philosophy than when
reading the _Investigations_. Yelps of amazement and joy,
I swear!

If the real thing is too weighty (the enormous section
about private languages is tough and needlessly confusing during
a first reading), try William H. Brenner's _W.'s Philosophical
Investigations_. It's an excellent overview of W.'s overall
argument(s) in the _Investigations_, plus it ties the material
together with much of W.'s other works.





Josh

-- 
i wanna know, am i the sky or a bird?