GRGR(16) non-verbal spaces

[Peter Petto]

Terrance F. Flaherty wrote:

>My comments are not about Wittgenstein, but I will indulge
>you if you care to discuss him, though I have not read him
>well, too boring, and even with the companion, I found he
>gave me a pain behind the eyes.

My first thought is I need all the indulgences I can get! But with the 
holidaze I'm a bit too overstimulated now for a good discussion of LW.

I've always taken him to be a mystic who wanted to talk in strict precise 
scientific terms. Which was frustrating for him and can be frustrating for 
the reader.

You might enjoy taking a look at _Culture and Value_. There's no companion 
for it, and none is needed.