GRGR(3): Jessica and Roger, Mind-to-mind
calbert at pop.tiac.net
calbert at pop.tiac.net
Mon Jun 7 10:27:54 CDT 1999
> Roger is considered by the Psi Section people to have a special power
> because he can reasonably predict the distribution of rocket hits across
> the London grid.
By employing Poisson's formula. It seems a little forced to make this
a "power", though I would agree that it appears P's purpose, given
that Pointsman seems so incapapble of grasping the idea.
> Both his and Jessica's, er, special powers seem to be
> situated within the (relatively speaking) mundane: mathematics and love.
> Yet much of the novel appears to revolve around these two subjects
> (particularly contemporary mathematics (is that the term I want?
> Statistics, maybe...), which examines randomness).
I suspect that you want statistics. What is examined is correlation
and probabilities, randomness is kinda like the void into which these
LaPutans peer, determined to discover patterns and shapes.
> [The Blicero/Gottfried
> thread has continued to blossom in the midst of this...]
I fear I may have established a bad precedent by expressing my
distaste for Blicero's sexual proclivities. I agree with (was it rj?)
who suggested that these games are a perfectly valid form of
"love-making". Gottfired is pretty much a slut getting his just
desserts, so I can't shed any tears for him. We've been provided at
least a modicum of justification for Katje's "sterility", and to the
degree that she contributes to the allied war effort, her actions
appear in a context of duty or sacrifice, however tortured. I can go
along with the floggings, crossdressing and sodomy, it was that ginzu
faux vulva which chapped my rear.
> Love in
> particularly seems to be often ignored in GR, but aren't there instances
> where it attempts to rear its head? Roger for Jessica, Slothrop (perhaps)
> for Katje?
So far Roger and Jessica fit the bill. Does anyone find it insincere
or in other ways questionable?
love,
cfa
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list