GRGR(3) - The Map(s) #2
calbert at pop.tiac.net
calbert at pop.tiac.net
Mon Jun 7 10:35:47 CDT 1999
> I don't think these stars are ever stated as representing "conquests." Any
> encounter will do. That they coincide with future bomb hits is "miraculous"
> in some sense. Will we ever KNOW the mechanism?
But that assumes that random rules these activities, which we have
reason to suspect is not so. Though its been a while since I was
down with Poisson, I think any process to which it is employed is not
totally random. This is simple enough to apply to the rockets (they
are targeted, subject to immutable laws of physics, there is at least
an element of predictablility in their behavior); it is the
possibility that Slothrop's conquests aren't entirely random which
makes the whole scenario so fertile for speculation. I recall there
being a direct implication of this sort by Slothrop in the early
chapters.
Again we see the contrast between strict causality and the oriental
concept of interrelatedness of all.
love,
cfa
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list