GRGR(3) talking dog 44.2

[keith woodward]

>Yes, the whole thing's very surreal or unreal--even if by some chance
>Keith's was the ONLY interpretation--that is, there was no talking dog at all
>but only Pointsman projecting one--because what I ask is MORE out of place
>than a behaviorist positing consciousness in a dog???? In a human either
>for that matter though that seems unavoidable.
>

But I never claimed that Pointsman projected the dog, nor the speech of the
dog.  I was concerned with the "Memory, or reflex" line.

Keith W