TS's session, X and a Spengler ?
DudiousMax at aol.com
DudiousMax at aol.com
Sun Jun 20 07:42:03 CDT 1999
Yo Terrance,
C'est Moi. Pepe le Pieu, with a question. Wasn't the
abreaction stuff done to guys who suffered with "Shell Shock," or some
variant of battle-fatigue? Or witnessed their best buddies being blown into
hamburger? I mean, TRP not withstanding, you don't think they were testing
for hyper-sensitives who might anticipate where the next batch of V-2's were
aimed? Or do you? I remember reading some things that were like, "It is a
credit to psychotherapy's clinical methods that the army has been able to
help shell-shock victims." Up to that minute in history, Freud stood in
limbo, neither accepted nor unaccepted. I think those "successes" were
important to the Freudians, and justified a rash of books, and the
investment (on a national scale) into training a generation of shrinks (Don't
forget, there was little or no relief for WWI shell-shock victims who became
a kind of public health burden in the period between the wars.) who worked a
generation to mixed reviews (The cliche is, and I don't know if I've seen any
hard data to back it up: a third get better, a third get worse, a third stay
the same.). Though they were well enough thought off at the time by the OSS
(the pre-CIA), Wild Bill Donovan ordered some shrinks to "analyze" all known
information on Hitler and come up with a secret psychological profile of that
unhappy camper, with the anticipation that they might have to negotiate with
him at the end of hostilities. I am saying that the therapies of WWII were a
lot less sinister, and maybe did a lot more good, than what Pynchon (who is,
I think, an anti-Freudian, seeing the shrinks as a priest caste of those
interested in social-control) portrays. Of course, he doesn't think much of
the Skinnerians and Pavlovians either, for similar reasons. And to some
extent he is playing those isms off against each other (in true Menippean
fashion). But my main thrust here is, I think the Psychological guys
weren't necessarily "evil" or "mad scientists" as Pynchon would have us
believe. They were guys who were trained in the disciplines of the time and
even if their work is questionable by todays standards, maybe they were
well-intentioned and doing the best they could with what they had, like
American Civil War surgeons who didn't understand germ theory. And they did
leave behind some incredible documents. See, THE MIND OF ADOLF HITLER: The
Secret Wartime Report: by Walter C. Langer, Basic Books (1972).
Max
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list