GRGR Role Call (was Re: Dear Murthy: Spurious)

[Ron Meiners]

At the risk of something or other... specifiying GRGR and opening it up
more clearly might be handy... have been on the list a month or so,
coincidentally also rereading GR, though not ostensibly part of the group,
and knowing more of the parameters of the organized activity might be fun.  

Just went through Tchicherine's (sorry, have forgotten spelling) meeting
Tyrone at Peenemunde this morning, and the wonderful concept of Scwartz...
argh, it's been a long day... nope the word has been forgotten.  Help anyone?
Seemed like a sort of critical notion- there's an earlier bit about
solidity being a function of one's awareness of time that's also
delightful- but this notion of a cloud?  A shadow?  Of the universe's
manifestation of one's fate.  Almost a sense of all identity, even in the
simplest terms, extending beyond the form of the individual.  Hadn't really
caught much of that, at least explicitly, before.  I tend to see paranoia
as a primarily internal function, and one dependant upon, ultimately, a
rate of change of perception of self in society.  Hence, directly tied to
self discovery, hence... really not external, at all, regardless of outside
manifestations.  But this Schwartzen something or other was an external
phenomenon... very interesting...

rm




At 02:27 PM 11/11/99 -0600, RICHARD_WILSON at udlp.com wrote:
>>  there's no grgr goin on
>
>gee, thanksalot... <insert favorite expletive phrases>
>
>Anyways, some of the more prominent contributors to past sections do
indeed seem
>to have dropped out (particularly, it seems, during my section). I pray it's
>nothing I wrote or did. If so then I'm so, so, so, so, so... so terribly
sorry.
>
>Perhaps it would be helpful (in restoring lost momentum if momentum has
indeed
>been lost)  if those of us who still consider ourselves GRGR participants
were
>to identify themselves in the form of a reply to this message (so that we all
>can know who we are by now or something to that effect). 
>
>Or perhaps not. Maybe the next moderator will simply do a better job than I
>(sob, sob, sob, sob... sniffle, sniffle). 
>
>--rwilson
>
>"no one receiving the radio's splintered waves" -- eno
>