GRGR(14) the yarns he spun
David Morris
fqmorris at hotmail.com
Mon Nov 22 22:27:30 CST 1999
>From: Michael Perez My own wild supposition is that
>Slothrop might have just place stars on all the rocket sites he visited
>and fabricated his liasons so that he and Tantivy would have something
>to talk about. After all, the snapshots of the map were taken after
>the fact and Slothrop could have made up the dates. However, wild that
>idea may be (and unsupported by any direct textual reference), the idea
>of the penis-as-rocket-magnet does fall a little flat after the above
>two revelation within the text. Then again, who knows who you can
>believe.
It does go flat... Goddammit! Where's that Viagra!
I think it matters little whether the encounters are real or fantasy.
>
>David wrote:
>"I think this is all connected to that "backward symmetry" mentioned in
>this section:
>---------
>(301.24) There was that backward symmetry again, one that Pointsman
>missed, but Katje didn't. 'A life of its own,' she said."
>---------
>
>Weisenburger (rightly so, I think) sends us back to 209.23 where Katje
>is talking about the rocket living a life from launch to explosion and
>about her and Slothrop being on the opposite ends of the rainbow, each
>with a perspective to which the other was not privy. She was in on the
>birth and infancy, Slothrop witnessed old age and disintegration.
>
But there are other ends to this rainbow too. They are Victim and
Victimizer, yadda, yadda, you know the rest. I think an implied emphasis
here is Living V. Not. Does "inert" matter have life? The Zero point of
Brenschluss (sp?) is reached via a dance w/ the consciousness of the
rocket's brain. When it cuts off the fuel it is completely on its own... I
think what makes "backward symmetry interesting is the implication of
two-way causality. Who is really in control?
David Morris
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list