"Across the interface"

[David Morris]

Let me try:

It's a Jungian thing.  Individuation's first step is to sort experience into 
"me" vs. "the rest of the world."  It is symbolized by the circle, a simple 
closed figure with an inside and an outside.  The inside is "me."  It is one 
of the first things a toddler scribbles given a crayon and paper.  
"Relatedness" begins with this act of separation, the establishing of 
"difference."  Before this inside/outside is established experience is 
chaos, AKA "The primary FULLNESS OF BEING."

Does that help?

David Morris

>From: Cjhurtt6 at aol.com
>
>lorentzen-nicklaus at t-online.de writes:
>
><<  "The Avoidance of Relationship is the Method Of psycho-physical egoity,
>  > but
>  >    the Feeling of Relatedness (or The Primal Illusion of 'Difference') 
>is
>  > itself
>  >    The (Original and Originating) Fault. Therefore, Divine Enlightment 
>Is
>Not
>  > A
>  >    Matter Of The Perfection Of Apparent Relationships (or The 'Curing' 
>Of
>The
>  >    Avoidance Of Relationship By The Apparent Perfection Of 
>Relatedness).
>  > Rather,
>  >    Ultimately (or Perfectly), Divine Enlightment Is A Matter Of The
>Perfect
>  >    Transcendence Of Relationship (or Relatedness, or All 'Difference') 
>In
>  > What Is
>  >    Always Already (Inherently and Perfectly) The Case (Which Is Being,
>  > Itself,
>  >    Consciousness, Itself, and Love-Bliss, Itself)."
>  >                                                    (Ruchira Avatar Adi 
>Da
>  > Samraj) >>
>
>  [- & asking]
>
>  > what?!?! relatedness?
>
>  No. The primary FULLNESS OF BEING which is given to all of us before any
>  experience of relatedness (- &, thus, "difference"). - KFL
>
>   >>
>okay..i don't even know what this means if anything.
>
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com