explanation part 2

[Christine Karatnytsky]

Quoth kwp:	

> I would say that GR IS NOT a technocratic text, but it describes a
technocratic world... this is an >important difference.

I don't necessarily disagree, but could you elaborate a bit, please?

It seems to me the book culminates in the triumph of technocracy, among
other things.  The critiques, antidotes and solace it offers against the
technocratic world seem marginal. 

If GR is not a technocratic text how does it move beyond technocracy? 
And, into what?  

ck
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.