Logocentrism

[Michel Ryckx]

jbor wrote: (...)

> No rules. Both/and, not either/or. Derrida & co. still read Plato, St
> Augustine et. al. but with a critical eye to the intrinsic preconceptions
> and hidden agendas which are made transparent by the processes of textual
> deconstruction.
>

Can you explain that?  I don't get it at all.

All this stuff about religion, however interesting:  I do not see religion in GR,
but I do see a lot of religious people in it, and I see a lot of religious
reminiscencies (does that word exist in English?) which is quite different.  But
that is due to the fact that religion is as weird to me as starving to death
because of hunger.

Feeling very dumb,
Michel.