Suggestion

rwan r.wank at cable.a2000.nl
Fri Jun 30 13:04:54 CDT 2000


If that's the worst you can anticipate, your faith in mankind in general and
in the Pynchon list in particular is still quite intact.
Wouldn't it be rather pynchonian to generate a self-splitting list: all
words denoting off-topic - or unwanted - concepts would automatically create
their own list or join up with other, existing, lists or newsgroups. Some of
them might, after some roaming around and about, join up with the PL again.
Heute die Welt... but yesterday: "Toto, we're not in Kansas anymore".
richard

----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Mackin <pmackin at clark.net>
To: <pynchon-l at waste.org>
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: Suggestion


>
>
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2000 KXX4493553 at aol.com wrote:
>
> > To prevent undesirable discussions for the future, I suggest to devide
PL
> > into two parts: GR for "selfreferential" POMO's and Tarot card players,
and
> > let' say Vineland for those who are more interested in politics and
history.
> > Everyone has from now on his own playground and all are satiesfied.
> > What's about that?
> > kwp
> >
> That's OK with me, but I see a problem. Many people may want to
> sign up for both lists, which is also OK, except that what may happen,
> horror of horrors, is they will send copies of all posts to both lists.
>
> Of course I may only be anticipating a worst case scenario.
>
> P.
>
>




More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list