Rocket riddle
A. Chesnick
chesnics at zeus.nhlbi.nih.gov
Wed Jun 21 08:07:21 CDT 2000
Hello All,
Being that I am a total pack rat and never throw out any old magazines...
I was rereading a few and found these letters in the "New Scientist" of 1994
that still may be of interest to those followers of the V-2 sound and time
inversions of Gravity's Rainbow.
Regards Scott
Rocket riddle
25 Jun 94
Few in London had an inkling as to how good our defenses against
V-1s were ('The V-1 menace: secret weapons that saved Britain', 4
June). I was in London during the war and a V-1 landed in a road 60
yards from our shelter, leaving a crater, 30 feet wide and 15 feet
deep. The houses around were just piles of rubble.
One day a V-2 landed 300 yards away. After the bang there was a
loud rushing sound for several seconds. The Imperial War Museum
says the rocket may have broken up on descending, the after sound
being the casing coming down. Do any New Scientist readers know if
you can hear a supersonic missile arriving, after it has arrived? I have
puzzled over this for 50 years.
Ernest Spratt Hayling Island, Hampshire
ERNEST SPRATT
From New Scientist magazine, vol 142 issue 1931, 25/06/1994, page 52
Hearing backwards
16 Jul 94
I, too, recall hearing this sound when a child and I remember the same
explanation being proffered afterwards. Though this seems plausible, I
now believe that there might be another, probably concurrent,
mechanism.
In the course of experimental work, I frequently detonate charges of
high explosive weighing tens or a few hundred grams on, or directly
above, steel plates lying on the ground. If no solid debris is likely to
be projected, I usually observe the events from a distance of 20 or 30
metres, protecting my ears with my hands.
As soon as I see the flash, hear the (attenuated) bang and feel the
blast, I remove my hands. Quite frequently (one in every hundred
shots, perhaps) I hear a sound varying from a metallic ringing to a
whine or even an apparently disembodied and rather eerie howl which
sometimes lasts for several seconds.
On such occasions I have frequently seen a smoke ring rising steadily
from the cloud of smoke still at ground level. Such a vortex, which
sometimes remains visible for tens of seconds, I suspect to be the
generator of the sound. The most favourable condition for the
generation of such vortices seems to be the detonation of an
explosive charge in an open-ended, upright pipe.
The characteristically deep conical crater of the fast V-2, as
described by Spratt, perhaps similarly favoured vortex formation. A
smoke ring is also frequently to be seen issuing from the muzzle of a
large gun.
The energy contained in vigorous vortices is, I believe, considerable,
and, if not disturbed, may be retained for a surprisingly long time. On
one memorable occasion a couple of years ago, wishing to be rid of
some hundreds of kilograms of explosive, some old fuel oil and an old
motor car at the same time, I retired to a promontory about a mile
away.
A splendid flash was followed by a generous bang. Though too far
away to hear any howl, I saw an enormous smoke ring rise to a few
hundred feet and drift slowly over my head where it became wobbly
and dispersed some four minutes later!
Sidney Alford Corsham, Wiltshire
SIDNEY ALFORD
From New Scientist magazine, vol 143 issue 1934, 16/07/1994, page 48
Hearing backwards
16 Jul 94
Yes, you could hear a V-2 coming after it had arrived (Letters, 25
June). It was my good fortune, both from the points of view of my
own personal safety and Ernest Spratt's curiosity, to be standing
some distance from, and perpendicular to, the flight path of a V-2.
It announced its arrival with its customary signature of a double bang
(bow wave followed by explosion) followed by a sound as of
something shooting away on a parabolic trajectory from the point of
impact. This could have only been the sound of the final stages of its
journey to us, in reverse.
Instead of the usual double bang we had BANG, BANG, WHOOSH all in
very quick succession.
Ken Harrow West Wickham, Kent
KEN HARROW
From New Scientist magazine, vol 143 issue 1934, 16/07/1994, page 48
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list