Writing Theory
Thomas Colin
thomas_colin at hotmail.com
Thu Mar 2 17:19:21 CST 2000
Speaking about the text that is all that is the case, as opposed to
searching the writer's mind for clues through scraps, writer's secret
intentions, unpublished juvenalia, first drafts, u.s.w., a few remarks:
1)If genetic criticism is occasionally interesting, it is also very often,
in my opinion, a pretext not to deal with the text we have (cf the endless
quest for the "sourcebook that Pynchon used to write this or that passage,"
or the wobbly psychological speculations induced by the study of a
manuscript's corrections, sucessive drafts of a same text, etc.). Doing
this, we always end up studying the author, not the text. This is
personnally not what I'm interested in.
2)The case of Melville reminds me of the French writer Georges Perec,
whose was a member of the OULIPO and whose work is in many ways admirable.
Perec's production ranged from creating crossword puzzles, listing words,
and other mindless pleasures, to writing incredibly complex novels (the most
famous one is La Disparition, which was written without using even once the
letter "e," that is the most common letter in French. Even more incredible,
this book was translated into English, keeping the constraint, but that's
another story). Now that Perec is dead, EVERYTHING he has ever written is
being published, which as a result seems to bury his masterpieces under a
pile of "junk" (I would not be surprised if the the next Perec book to be
posthumously published was made of the notes he jotted down on some loose
papers while on the phone...). I'm not sure this serves the cause of
literature. I even wonder if it's not a major offense to the memory of
Georges Perec.
3) I warmly recommend anyone to read W.K Wimsatt's "The Intentional
Fallacy" (in The Verbal Icon, Kentucky U P.), written some 50 years ago but
still very actual. Wimsatt is not someone I would usually identify with, but
this one article is to my mind essential to ask oneself the good questions,
and forget about the more or less specious ones.
Tom.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list