To V. Or Not To V.

[GEORGE KOLLIOPOULOS]

 Since i`ve just rejoined the List, i like the idea of groupreading V. So,
to
 me, is To V.
 I agree, sometimes there`s a lot of noise in here, but i have exactly the
 same problem inside and outside my house. What i can do? I close my ears.
 Simple as that.

 PS: Slow Learner was translated and published in Greece this summer. I`ve
 enjoyed re-reading it during my vacations. This Entropy story has a lot of
 energy in it, Ordered or Disordered.

 gkoll

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "s~Z" <keith at pfmentum.com>
> To: "Pynchlist" <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 5:03 PM
> Subject: To V. Or Not To V.
>
>
> > I'm going to go with davemarc's suggestion that we take a break from an
> > organized reading. There is not a unified agreement that we should do
V.V.
> > And, there is a fair amount of bickering and complaining about how the
> list
> > is going...not a good beginning point for another 'formal' read. So, I
am
> > abdicating as the organizer of V.V., and as host of section 1. If others
> > disagree, I leave it to them to pick it up and make it go. I'll copy the
> > hostlist below in case someone wants to keep it going. I'm voting with
> > davemarc, though:
> >
> > *************************************
> > Oct 2/ch.1/I-III (pp. 9-30):
> > Oct 16/ch.1/IV-V (pp. 30-43): cj hurtt
> > Oct 30/ch.2/I-II (pp. 44-60): Thomas Lundvall
> > Nov 13/ch.3/0-III (pp. 61-76): Dedalus
> > Nov 27/ch.3/IV-VIII (pp.77-94): Jill
> > Dec 11/ch.4/0-III (pp. 95-110): Ben McLeod
> > Jan 8/ch.5/I-II (pp. 111-133):  JB Frame
> > Jan 22/ch.6/I-II (pp. 134-151): Michael Perez
> > *************************************
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>