To V. Or Not To V.

[s~Z]

I'm going to go with davemarc's suggestion that we take a break from an
organized reading. There is not a unified agreement that we should do V.V.
And, there is a fair amount of bickering and complaining about how the list
is going...not a good beginning point for another 'formal' read. So, I am
abdicating as the organizer of V.V., and as host of section 1. If others
disagree, I leave it to them to pick it up and make it go. I'll copy the
hostlist below in case someone wants to keep it going. I'm voting with
davemarc, though:

*************************************
Oct 2/ch.1/I-III (pp. 9-30):
Oct 16/ch.1/IV-V (pp. 30-43): cj hurtt
Oct 30/ch.2/I-II (pp. 44-60): Thomas Lundvall
Nov 13/ch.3/0-III (pp. 61-76): Dedalus
Nov 27/ch.3/IV-VIII (pp.77-94): Jill
Dec 11/ch.4/0-III (pp. 95-110): Ben McLeod
Jan 8/ch.5/I-II (pp. 111-133):  JB Frame
Jan 22/ch.6/I-II (pp. 134-151): Michael Perez
*************************************