The Salvation of Europe
Dave Monroe
davidmmonroe at hotmail.com
Tue Aug 28 11:26:17 CDT 2001
"'The salvation of Europe,' Konrad says, 'depends on communication, right?
We face this anarchy of jealous German princes, hundreds of them scheming,
infighting, dissipating all of the Empire's strength in their useless
bickering. But whoever could control the lines of communication, among all
these princes, would control them. That network could someday unify the
Continent.'" (Lot 49, Ch. 6, p. 164)
>From Bernhard Siegert, Relays: Literature as an Epoch of the Postal System,
trans. Kevin Repp (Stanford: Stanford UP, 1999), Ch. 1 "An Epoch of the
Postal System," pp. 4-19 ...
"Postal systems are instrumenta regni. Until well into the early modern
period, that was blatantly obvious. Thus, the famous edict of Louis XI by
which the French state postal system replaced the courier system of the
Unviersity of Paris decreed all those who dared to submit private letters to
the postal system were sent to Hades, just as they had been in the last
phase of the western Roman Empire. Initially--between 1490 and 1516--the
Taxis Post did not consist of permanent routes, but of varying connections
between the emperor's current location and his court chancery, since, as
Maximillian I let it be known, the postal system had been established 'for
our well-being and honor.' For this reason, the postal services established
according to a 1516 treat that Franz and Baptissa de Tassis concluded with
Charles I (after 1519, Emperor Charles V), were 'not to be sent out at all,
except for the letters of the king.' Postal routes were to onnect the
cvornerstones of the Habsburg Empire in Spain, the Netherlands, Rome,
Naples, and Germany in order to arrange the marriage politics and diplonatic
allainces in which the empire manifested itself. In an imperial postal
system such as this one, a 'message' did not mean 'communicating with one
another,' but was instead a notification to 'act in accordance,'
Danachricten in the Middle High German meaning of the word. In 1496,
Maximillian also set up the first field post on German soil--obviously not
for reasons of psychological warfare, since his mercenaries were illiterate,
but instead, for the purpose of transferring orders to 'act in accordnace'
to the army command.
"Like the styate postal systems, the courier services came into being
during the Middle Ages formed cvlosed systems: they posted only their opwn
respective institutions. The university post circulated students and
scholars, along with knowledge, teh communal courier systems circulated the
business of the magsitrate, the butcher post that of businessman, the
princely couriers that of the princes. The couriers of the monasteries, in
fact, transferred only a single message: the death of brothers in their
order.
"In the seventeenth century--in the context of the so-called postal
reformation at the end of the sixteenth--the situation changed. Exactly in
1600, Cardinal Duke Albrecht VII, viceroy of the Netherlands, granted the
Taxis formal permission to charge postage for private letters, thus
legitimizing the abuse of the postal system they long had been practicing.
Supported by an imperial communications technology that was misused for the
general communication of 'people' and that thereby had lost the definition
applied to it since the sixth century B.C., the absolutist state invented
the uniformly ruled space, the territory. Within this space, the people
were subjects, pure and simple, and therefore vassals of the monarch,
insofar as a general postal system provided the opportunity for words to
circulate beneath all the discursive barriers of guild and estate. The only
prerequisite for this was a redefinition of the postal raison d'etre: postal
systems no longer existed for the well-being and the honor of the emperor or
the king, but for the well-being of a population of subjects.
"Insofar as the existence of subjects is bound to reason's delivery to
cognition, the power of teh state grounded itself in the establishment and
monopolization of that delivery. The state produced 'subjects' in both
senses of the word by inventing the general post, the postal monopoly, and
the usefulness of the postal system.... every subject gained access to a
discursive authority in the posttal realm that allowed him to determine his
own affairs and at the same time forced him, with each determination
(destination), to register his affairs with teh state. The ubiquity and
invisibility of the state were thus to be found in the representation of the
postal system as a medium for private correspondence between cognitive
subjects. Between objects and the modern subject with true cognition, the
commands of royal, electoral, or ducal postmasters reigned supreme....
Absolutism made words available to the people, and a medium available to the
owrds, in order to make people speak about themselves, to control their
speech, and to finance the state's expenditures for such control with the
postage charged for that speech. If the basic element of the imperial
postal system had been the route, for the teritorial state postal system it
became the realy--a site where the people became entangeld in the discourse.
As postal systems became a technology of the government with the invention
of postage and the monopolization of service .... Institutionally, this
meant that the postal system fell under police jurisdiction.
"'What empowers the principle of reason' was the postal system. Once the
principe postale provided for the delivery of cognition, the objects' mode
of being was a monopoly of the state...." (pp. 7-9)
Originally published in German as ...
Siegert, Bernhard. Relais: Geschicke der Literatur
als Epoche der Post, 1751-1913. Berlin: Brinkmann
und Bose, 1999.
http://141.20.150.7/aesthetic/bsiegert.htm
And see as well, e.g., ...
Beyrer, Klaus. Die Postkutschenreise.
Tubingen, 1985.
John, Richard R. Spreading the News:
The American Postal System from Franklin to Morse.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1995.
Thomas, The Imperial Archive: Knowledge and
the Fantasy of Empire. New York: Verso, 1993.
Von Creveld, Martin L. Command in War
Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1985.
http://www.ctheory.com/global/ga114.html
And from Siegert's "Introduction," pp. 1-3 ...
"Someone who knew that America is a legacy, something to be pased along, has
written all this down much better than the writer of these pages might have
done; hence, The Crying of Lot 49 could not possibly become the object of
this study. Literay scholarship conducted as the analysis of media and
discourse must come to a halt before the researches of Oedipa Maas bcause
those researches are its own. The empire is a postal system, and that
empire is war.... The mepire of posted objects, the world that is
everything that is the case, is distorted, inetrrupted, irreducibly
nonactual: it is metaphorical. The name of the 'metaphoric catastrophe' is
Tristero...." (pp. 2-3)
Citing p. 65 of ...
Derrida, Jacques. The Post Card: From Socrates
to Freud and Beyond. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago:
U of Chicago P, 1987.
And here Siegert continues to discuss briefly the passage cited at the
beginning of this post ...
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list