Suggestions

[jbor]

Perhaps more perceptive, certainly more sympathetic, is Michael Wood's _New
York Review of Books_ review of _GR_, if memory serves.

http://www.nybooks.com/nyrev/WWWarchdisplay.cgi?19730322022R

Unfortunately their archives are down at the moment.

Locke's NYT review discloses somewhat stereotyped notions of "romantic love"
and what should or can constitute emotional attachment or affection imo. He
also misses the entire point of the final section of the novel, as the whole
constructed realist/Modernist literary artifice comes tumbling down (i.e.
de-constructs).

Most of the critical works and the sites and on-line essays have something
to recommend: they've all been linked or cited before, and it's generally
not that difficult to use a library catalogue or search engine for oneself.

best


----------
>From: Dave Monroe <davidmmonroe at yahoo.com>