IBM monotheism

[MalignD at aol.com]

>>By all means use the term but also be aware that you are appropriating it
somewhat ambiguously. The disagreement you and Eric are having is about your
respective *interpretations* of the past (i.e. what you refer to as
"history") rather than over the particular past event/s (which you also seem
to be referring to as "history").>>

I think I know what I'm disagreeing with (thanks, neverthless, for the help), 
which are facts.  Intellectual property was licensed, not stolen.  If I'm 
wrong in saying that, it's because I have the facts wrong, not becuase I've 
misinterpreted.

Whether or not Eric thinks "stealing" and "licensing" is a matter of 
interpretation is something you'll have to take up with him.