blicero's sexuality.2

[Terrance]

jbor wrote:
> 
> ----------
> >From: Terrance <lycidas2 at earthlink.net>
> >
> 
> Eddins:
> 
> > After a coldly
> > technical discussion of the beam scanning apparatus needed
> > to render the "Imipoletic Surface...erectile,"
> 
> Actually, this is alternative b) of the three methods for "signaling *to*
> the plastic surface". Eddins takes one sentence from the section *out of
> context* and refers to it as "coldly technical", which it isn't really
> anyway. Indeed, the discussion of the characteristics of Imipolex G in this
> section of the text can hardly be described as "coldly technical". See
> 699.23-36 in particular: "What are stars but points in the body of God where
> we insert the healing needles of our terror and longing? [ ... ] " etc !!!
> 
> > the Swiftian
> > projector
> 
> Say what? It's a parenthesis, another point of view, an alternative
> narrative agency, a *dialectic*.
> 
> > touches on the question of "What lies just
> > beneath,"
> 
> And that would be the skin and flesh of the human subject, wouldn't it?
> 
> > only to conclude that ["]we need not dwell here on
> > the Primary Problem, namely that everything below the
> > plastic film does after all lie in the Region of
> > Uncertainty, except to emphasize to beginning students who
> > may be prone to Schwarmerei, that terms referring to the
> > Subimipolexity such as 'Core' and 'Center of Internal
> > Energy' possess, outside the theoretical, no more reality
> > than do terms such as 'Supersonic Region' or 'Center of
> > Gravity' in other areas of Science." (p.7000).
> 
> So, "Subimipolexity" would refer to the human organism, wouldn't it? Isn't
> the parenthetic aside (Eddins' "Swiftian projector"!) in fact challenging
> the "reality" of the "theoretical" conceptions of body and soul (i.e. "Core"
> and "Center of Internal Energy") as somehow outside (or above) the rest of
> what constitutes the material world? Isn't this the "Primary Problem"???
> 
> best


You are making a jack ass of yourself. The Primary Problem?
Read the next paragraph in the book. 

Look, you don't know what the hell you are talking about
here jbor, it's obvious, so please stay out of it. I
appreciate your comments on GR and Blicero, but on Eddins
you are so far off it's obvious you have not read the book
in so many years as you have admitted here. Can you wait
until we get some of it on the table before you start trying
to pull the discussion down on the floor?