NP? Wounded prisoners shot and left to die
David Morris
fqmorris at hotmail.com
Wed Nov 28 10:10:44 CST 2001
>From: Doug Millison <millison at online-journalist.com>
>If those Taliban soldiers had surrendered, how was it that the Northern
>Alliance allowed them to keep their weapons?
>
>It smells rotten, like a set-up job to give the US an excuse to kill the
>prisoners as Rumsfeld has been urging for more than a week now. Time and
>more information will tell.
If you want more information, try reading some reports from journalists
reporting from the location instead of relying on your olfactory prowess
(some "online-journalist" you are!):
http://www.guardian.co.uk/afghanistan/story/0,1284,608101,00.html
Luke Harding in Mazar-i-Sharif
Wednesday November 28, 2001
The Guardian
The spectacular revolt of Taliban prisoners in the fort in Mazar-i-Sharif
finally ended last night when troops used a tank to kill the remaining
hardliners who had improbably survived repeated American air strikes on
their basement hideout.
Early yesterday, US planes blasted the mini-citadel inside the fort where
the Taliban's foreign fighters had been holed up for the past two days.
Incredibly, some survived. At 8am they even launched a counterattack,
shooting dead several soldiers who had been sniping at them from ramparts.
Government troops blasted the Taliban with mortars, rockets and withering
gunfire. By mid-afternoon, only three of the 400-odd foreign prisoners who
had originally stormed the castle on Sunday were still alive. They refused
all offers of surrender, shouting: "You are American people. We won't
surrender to you."
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list