Israeli security issued urgent warning to CIA of large-scale terror attacks

[KXX4493553 at aol.com]

http://news.telegraph.co.uk/

Israeli security issued urgent warning to CIA of large-scale terror attacks
By David Wastell in Washington and Philip Jacobson in Jerusalem
(Filed: 16/09/2001)


ISRAELI intelligence officials say that they warned their counterparts in the
United States last month that large-scale terrorist attacks on highly visible
targets on the American mainland were imminent.

The attacks on the World Trade Centre's twin towers and the Pentagon were
humiliating blows to the intelligence services, which failed to foresee them,
and to the defence forces of the most powerful nation in the world, which
failed to deflect them.

The Telegraph has learnt that two senior experts with Mossad, the Israeli
military intelligence service, were sent to Washington in August to alert the
CIA and FBI to the existence of a cell of as many of 200 terrorists said to
be preparing a big operation.

"They had no specific information about what was being planned but linked the
plot to Osama bin Laden and told the Americans that there were strong grounds
for suspecting Iraqi involvement," said a senior Israeli security official.

The CIA has said that it had no hard information that would have led to the
prevention of the hijacking, but the FBI said it believed that cells
operating within America and totalling at least 50 terrorists were behind
last week's devastating hijacks; the names of new suspects are being added to
the list daily.

America's intelligence agencies are being widely blamed for their failure to
predict the attacks, or anything like them, and for not discovering any of
the terrorist cells before the hijackings on Tuesday. Some of those who took
part had lived in the US for months, or even years.

Evidence that a clear Israeli warning was delivered to American authorities,
but ignored, would be a further blow to the reputation of the CIA, which is
under fire for its failure last week.

An administration official in Washington said: "If this is true then the
refusal to take it seriously will mean heads will roll. It is quite credible
that the CIA might not heed a Mossad warning: it has a history of being
overcautious about Israeli information."


For years, staff at the Pentagon joked that they worked at "Ground Zero", the
spot at which an incoming nuclear missile aimed at America's defences would
explode. There is even a snack bar of that name in the central courtyard of
the five-sided building, America's most obvious military bullseye.

This weekend, five days after that target was struck with devastating effect
by a hijacked plane, the joking has stopped.

It is far from certain that any military commander would have had the courage
to recommend shooting down a passenger airliner, even in the unprecedented
circumstances of last Tuesday.

For three of the four airliners hijacked last week, however, the question did
not even arise. Two pairs of combat fighters were scrambled into action but
did not get near enough to shoot any of them down.

Norad, the command headquarters in Colorado responsible for defending all of
North America from air attack, was notified of the first hijack at 8.38am and
six minutes later two F-15 fighter jets were ordered into the air from Otis
airforce base on Cape Cod.

Before they could take off, however, the first hijacked airliner crashed into
the World Trade Centre's north tower at 8.46am. Six minutes later the two
military jets were airborne, but when the second hijacked airliner hit the
south tower shortly after 9am they were still 70 miles from Manhattan.

The only successful action against the hijackers was taken by passengers of
the fourth airliner, whose heroic decision to fight back led to its crashing
into the fields of Pennsylvania.

The reason lies in the strict distinction America draws between civil and
military power, combined with the fact that until last week nobody had
confronted the possibility that a terrorist hijacker might turn kamikaze
pilot.

Although Norad has its own radar system to track aircraft over the US, its
prime task is to watch for hostile aircraft approaching America from outside.
"We assume anything originating in US airspace is friendly," said a spokesman.

For the same reason, the 20 or so American fighter planes on permanent full
alert in case of a suspect intruder, were deployed at half a dozen bases in
the likeliest flightpaths of an attack from the former Soviet Union, several
hundred miles from New York or Washington DC.

All aircraft flying over American airspace are monitored and controlled by a
network of 20 regional Federal Aviation Authority air traffic control
centres, backed up by individual airport control towers. Military aircraft
under Norad control can intervene with domestic traffic only if called on for
help by their civilian colleagues.

That is what happened on Tuesday, but in no case was there apparently enough
time after the FAA's warning for fighter planes to reach the hijacked
airliners.

More puzzling, there were 45 minutes between air traffic controllers losing
contact with the third airliner, which took off from Dulles airport just
outside Washington, and its crash on to the Pentagon.

At that point, however, the aircraft was still flying on its intended course
westwards. It may not have been until later, possibly after a passenger's
mobile phone call to the Justice Department, that the civil authorities
finally twigged what was happening.

It was not the military but civilian air traffic controllers at Washington's
Reagan National Airport - tipped off by their colleagues at Dulles - who
alerted the White House to the fact that an unauthorised jet was flying at
full throttle towards it.

As shaken White House staff began a frantic evacuation, the aircraft banked,
performed a 270 degree turn and sailed past lines of aghast drivers on
expressways to crash explosively into the west side of the Pentagon.

If the airliner had approached much nearer to the White House it might have
been shot down by the Secret Service, who are believed to have a battery of
ground-to-air Stinger missiles ready to defend the president's home.

The Pentagon is not similarly defended. "We are an open society," said a
military official. "We don't have soldiers positioned on the White House lawn
and we don't have the Pentagon ringed with bunkers and tanks."

It emerged last night that two F-16 fighters took off from Langley airforce
base in Virginia just two minutes before the American Airlines Boeing 767
crashed into the Pentagon, again too late to have a chance of intercepting.

Only the fourth hijacked airliner, which was less than 30 minutes from
Washington when it crashed, might have been successfully intercepted: air
traffic controllers at a regional centre in Nashua, New Hampshire, told a
Boston newspaper that at least one F-16 fighter was in hot pursuit, and
defence officials confirmed that the fighters already launched from Langley
were on their way to intercept the flight when passengers apparently took
matters into their own hands.

Deep inside the Pentagon, in the hardened bunkers of the National Military
Joint Intelligence Centre, senior officials were said to be "stunned" by the
terrorists' achievement.

Within minutes of the attack American forces around the world were put on one
of their highest states of alert - Defcon 3, just two notches short of
all-out war - and F-16s from Andrews Air Force Base were in the air over
Washington DC.

A flotilla of warships was deployed along the east coast from bases in
Virginia and Florida, with two aircraft-carriers to help protect the airspace
around New York and Washington DC. Off the west coast, a further 10 ships put
to sea to take up station close to the shore.

Extra Awacs aerial reconnaissance aircraft were sent aloft to ensure that
nothing other than military aircraft flew in American airspace - a home-grown
version of the "no-fly zones" enforced for many years over Iraq. For much of
the rest of the week, the unsettling roar of F-15 and F-16 fighters
patrolling the skies high above America's biggest cities replaced the usual
rumble of commercial airliners.

On Friday, in a tacit admission that America must in future be better
prepared, Donald Rumsfeld, the Defence Secretary, announced that fighters
were being put on a 15-minute "strip" alert at 26 bases nationwide.

There was anger among politicians at what many saw as the failure of the
intelligence services, and some officials on Capitol Hill began canvassing
support for a move to force George Tenet, the director of the Central
Intelligence Agency, originally appointed by Clinton, to step aside.

James Traficant, a Democratic congressman from Pennsylvania, said that for
years Congress had poured billions of dollars of largely unscrutinised
funding into America's intelligence services, "yet we learnt of every one of
these tragedies from Fox News and CNN"- two television channels. Senator
Richard Shelby, a Republican member of the Senate intelligence committee,
said it was "a failure of great dimension".

There are moves to address one severe shortcoming noted by many critics: the
CIA's reliance on technological rather than "human" means to gather
information, and its weakness as a means of finding out what Osama bin Laden
is up to.

During the Clinton administration, Congress banned the CIA from recruiting as
a paid informer anyone with a criminal record or who was guilty of human
rights violations. James Woolsey, another former CIA director, said: "Inside
bin Laden's organisation there are only people who want to be human rights
violators. If you don't recruit them then you don't recruit anyone."





Kurt-Werner Pörtner