antw. RE: antw. pynchon's strictly humanist concern
lorentzen-nicklaus
lorentzen-nicklaus at t-online.de
Fri Apr 12 07:28:45 CDT 2002
Cyrus schrieb:
> lorentzen-nicklaus at t-online.de (lorentzen-nicklaus) wrote:
>
> > terrance wrote: pynchon's
> > "concern is not machines, but humans."
> >
> >
> > yet didn't he study physics and even do engineering at boeing?
> > kai
> So what?
so this has influenced pynchon's writing heavily, and i think we do miss
most of the pretty interesting (& often ambivalent) details the
rainbow-maker has to tell us about non-humans, like robots or elves, when
we act as if early-modern humanism has just been invented and would prevent
the world from deadly crimes ... perhaps pynchon did really "switch" to
english literature out of some humanist intention (personally i doubt
this), but you probably know what they say about old nuns...they all were
beasty bitches once. one of the fellows interviewed in "a journey into
the mind of p." worked with tommy at boeing and reported that trp, unlike
we all loved to think for years, did not (only) do the soft-science-clown
inside the steely house of yoyodyne, yet was deeply involved into the
construction of trans-continental flying-machines ... & then the man's
artistic interest in technology is a little to intense for a luddite with
pure heart ... which of course doesn't mean that you cannot read his works
like this ... let's support solar-technology now! kai, rational luddite
ps: bruno latour's article "actor/network-theory. some clarifications",
though far away from being unproblematic, might work as kinda short-cut to
an updated understanding of technology.
[schnipp]
> Now seriously, Pynchon's concern is the human condition. Machines and
> mechanical structures mostly promote death in his work. And I believe
> Pynchon is pro-life.
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list