NP? "the formerly colonised coming back to haunt us"
Cyrus
cyrusgeo at netscape.net
Sat Dec 21 11:17:47 CST 2002
Otto wrote:
>I agree, but precisely that makes it inevitably racist like the overwhelming
>part of our literature. And sexist too, remember there's even a female
>monster to be killed in it.
>
You know I respect you 100%, but I cannot understand this kind of
reasoning. What if there were only male monsters? Wouldn't the absence
of the female element qualify it as sexist too? What if the "good"
characters were all female and the "evil" ones all male? Would that be
sexist? What if there were only female characters? My point is, one can
"discover" sexist aspects in everything, if one wants to.
I understand the open-minded white males' collective need to make up for
all these centuries of oppression against women and "non-white people"
(sorry I can't find a more suitable term), but I don't see why we should
demonize everything along the way.
Now, as for racism, a writer of fairy tales (and the LOTR is one) has to
use sterotypes. A Hindoo writer might have described things differently;
or a Chinese; or a Congolese; or an Aboriginal. Or maybe they would put
into the story their own "racisms", if any. But the fact is, for Tolkien
and his first audience, white was good, and black was bad. Why associate
it with "white supremacy" and "fear of or contempt towards coloured
people", and not with "joy of daylight" and "fear of the dark", traits
common to many people of many nationalities even today?
Why see racism in everything?
Why not simply ignore race altogether and treat everybody the same way?
Cyrus
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list