MDDM Dixon's act of violence

[Terrance]

jbor wrote:
> 
> on 8/3/02 10:02 AM, Doug Millison at millison at online-journalist.com wrote:
> 
> > Are you arguing that Pynchon is advancing the notion that a violent
> > response to injustice is justified? I don't think you can support that with
> > textual evidence from M&D.   And, if that's what you are arguing, how does
> > that square with your perennial argument that Pynchon does not make such
> > choices or judgements, that he leaves things open and ambiguous letting the
> > reader make her own interpretation, reach her own conclusion?
> 
> No, I was just questioning your interpretation of the passage, which I don't
> believe is a valid one.

Valid? It is crap. Stick to the book. It's very simple, really. Doug is
full of crap. 
And dave monroe is full of shit. Come on boys, bring it on, You got
nothing! 

We read the book. And the book (in case you forgot it is Mason & Dixon)
and you guys can't make a case with the book as we can. It's silly, how
simple it would be if this were Uncle Tom's Cabin, but it ain't. 

Nope Doug, you wrong again. Shit, HAVE YOU READ THE BOOK? m&d THAT IS.
YOU HAVE GOT TO BE HIGH, DIXON PACIFIST? DID YOU READ m&d?