pynchon-l-digest V2 #3050
Terrance
lycidas2 at earthlink.net
Fri Feb 21 09:43:38 CST 2003
Malignd wrote:
>
> Next week: That/which.
>
For those who believe that english has grammar (it does not) or are
interested in usage or elements of srunken white style, a dictionary is
probably not the best book to guide you.
William Strunk Jr. and E.B. White
The Elements of Style
can be purchased for about a buck at lots of used book stores or you can
get one at one of those online super stores for a fin.
Another excellent handbook is Hans P. Guth
New Concise Handbook
who/which/that
WHO and WHOM refer to pronouns (the man WHOM I asked").
WHICH refers to ideas and things ("my son's car, WHICH I bought).
A WHO, WHOM, or WHICH introducing a restrictive clause may (not can) be
replaced with THAT. In such situations, conservative usage keeps WHO
(WHOM) but prefers THAT to WHICH.
Restrictive: The man whom I asked liked the car that I bought.
OF WHICH and IN WHICH can easily make a sentence awkward. WHOSE is
therefore widely accepted in reference to ideas and things: "the
Shank-Painter Swamp, WHOSE expressive name ... gave it it importance in
our eyes" (Thoreau).
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list