Was Reading and discussing Pynchon's texts

[s~Z]

>>> Far rather this, (or practically anything we haven't group-read before)
than  a rehashing of all the old arguments.  Of course we'll still get all
the
old  arguments - but at least in a different setting.<<<

Exactly. But, Pale Fire deals with some of the things we argue about in a
way that will be very entertaining as fodder on this list. Formatting the
discussion raises interesting issues. I would vote for going straight
through it, although that might prove impossible. We would be reading and
discussing the poem prior to reading and discussing Kinbote's commentary on
the poem which would create a need to re-examine the poem. Are we really
going to do this?