FW: summing up

[pynchonoid]

When I answered this post awhile ago, I didn't realize
it was to Pynchon-L, too.

--- "Vincent A. Maeder" <vmaeder at cyhc-law.com> wrote:
> From: pynchonoid >>Too bad the Pale Fire group
> couldn't see a way to
> propose a discussion that would have a Pynchon
> focus. 
> davemarc offered a good suggestion, but it was,
> predictably, ignored.<<
> 
> Well, just to reiterate what I had posted earlier
> concerning a Pynchon
> focus of Pale Fire... I had previously posted:

No criticism intended at all. Your suggestion was a
good one, and you've come up with some great
resources.  Too bad s~Z -- who started this Pale Fire
ball rolling -- didn't  follow up on it (and on
davemarc's suggestion).

It seems clear now that the Gang of Five was just
stirring up shit, more interested in putting up a list
of names that excluded me than anything else. 

I agree that a discussion of Pale Fire with a Pynchon
focus could be quite interesting, but that's not what
s-Z proposed.  As I said to the list, I doubt the
ability of s~Z, Morris, and that little group to
conduct a Pynchon-focused discussion of the novel.

-Doug

"Labia Boy" -- nasty, but I can't keep from chuckling.




=====
<http://www.pynchonoid.org/>

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com