Watts article

[Paul Mackin]

On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 14:43, davemarc wrote:
> From: jbor <jbor at bigpond.com>
> 
> > It is,
> > after all, a piece of investigative journalism,
> 
> Does anyone besides me question this terminology? I wonder whether the
> article
> qualifies as what most people understand as "investigative journalism"--it's
> not as if Pynchon unearthed covered-up documents or solved a crime. I've
> seen the term "literary journalism." Would that be more appropriate? Anyone
> got a copy of Journalism 101 handy?


It's a tiny bit like Gonzo journalism. Does anyone know if the Pyncher
was under the influence when he wrote the piece?