NP Mein Kampf (was NP another stoopid list ...
François Monti
francois at neovoid.org
Mon Jun 6 06:20:14 CDT 2005
I remember that, a couple of years ago, an association of children
protection sued an art gallery who had curated an exhibition of a
photographer whose work solely concentrated on photos of prenubile children
naked. The association won, the exhibition had to be stopped. It happened in
Toulouse or Bordeaux, France.Then again France has a mix record when it
comes to freedom of speech.
I also seem to remember that a couple of person were condemned in the UK for
blaspheming Jesus Christ, a couple of years ago. The judge invoked a
anti-blasphemy act from the 18th century.
I myself think there should be absolute free-speech, but you shouldn't think
that governements or judges do share this point of view in Europe. We censor
less than 50 years ago, but we still do.
François
http://www.musiquemachine.com
http://table-rase.blogspot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
6, rue Pietkin
B4000 Liège
Belgium
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternate e-mail:
francois at musiquemachine.com
francoismonti at hotmail.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cyrus" <ioannissevastianos at yahoo.gr>
To: <jbor at bigpond.com>; <pynchon-l at waste.org>
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: NP Mein Kampf (was NP another stoopid list ...
> jbor at bigpond.com wrote:
>
>> The issues of censorship and freedom of speech aren't as clear cut as the
>> libertarians would have you believe. Books and movies are still banned,
>> even in supposedly "progressive" or "liberal" Western nations, but moreso
>> obviously under sterner civil jurisdictions. Even 'Harry Potter' ends up
>> on the banned list in schools in Utah or wherever. And I wonder how
>> comfortable some people would be nowadays to allow their children open
>> access to, say, 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion'.
>
>
> Hi, jbor
>
> I think the notion of freedom of speech is quite clear. Every idea should
> be allowed to circulate, even if it's outright harmful, and every artist
> should be allowed freedom of expression, even if his art may be insulting
> to certain groups of people. And if one doesn't agree with what is being
> said or shown, one has the right to criticise it publicly. I don't know
> any instances of government-banned books or art in Europe in the last 20
> years or so (ok, "Mein Kampf" in Germany is understandable, even ancient
> Greeks didn't wan't to hear about their own misfortunes in Epidaurus). If
> you do, please share. Certainly there are groups lobbying, trying to ban
> this and that, but they fail in courts, as far as I know.
>
> And I see no harm in allowing my (future) children open access to "The
> Protocols of the Elders of Zion", the "Da Vinci Code", or "The Holy
> Bible", as long as it's clear to them that they are works of fiction.
>
> Cyrus.
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.6.2 - Release Date: 4/06/2005
>
>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list