"The Evacuation still proceeds..." GR Part 1 Section 1
Paul Mackin
paul.mackin at verizon.net
Mon Oct 31 06:29:45 CST 2005
On Oct 31, 2005, at 1:05 AM, Bekah wrote:
> At 11:51 AM -0400 10/27/05, Paul Mackin wrote:
>
>>
>> It is clear to everyone, isn't it, that the war between the
>> Allies and the Axis powers was NOT over the Final Solution.
>> Rather, it was that the Nazi war machine had consumed much of
>> Europe, at one point almost to the point of an all out invasion of
>> the British Isles. The fate of Europe was in the balance. The
>> attempt on the part of the Allies to reverse the disastrous
>> situation would have been the case with or without the Death and
>> Labor camps. And the effort of the Nazis to hang on until the
>> bitter end would also have been the same with or without them.
>>
>>
>
>
> But today, in people's minds, WWII is far more about the Holocaust
> than it was in 1944-45. In 1950 a book about Europe and WWII
> could have been written, and many were, which totally ignored the
> "Final Solution," focusing instead on the "diplomacy" and military
> strategy/maneuvers/heros (look at all the war movies). Today's
> readers would be very cognizant of the holocaust no matter what the
> specific WWII in Europe topic. In the late 60s there was a
> growing awareness of the enormity of the genocide, but there was
> a more immediate awareness of the bomb.
>
> Bekah
Yes, in the early 60s (where I lived at least) it was as if, in the
prevailing conversation, someone had rather abruptly changed the
subject. It was a big cultural adjustment for America to make. For
Jews and nonJews alike. The topic stopped being the Blitz, the
Resistance, Pearl Harbor, General MacArthur, the Second Front, D-Day,
Stalingrad, but now was the Holocaust.
Of course there were OTHER momentous 60s distractions from the
particular war I personally had remembered. By the time Gravity's
Rainbow came along WW II was for me almost a distant memory. The
book brought it all back.
>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list