AtD blurb - "false" religiosity?

[Otto]

2006/8/17, Keith McMullen <keithsz at mac.com>:
> Objective atheismism. What balderdash that atheism leads to some kind
> of objectivity. Atheism is as much of a biased subjective conceptual
> framework as any other ism. There's no way to get beyond
> subjectivity. Es imposible.
>

So they say, yes.

But I tend to think that you can get to a quasi-objective point of
view if you're in no way personally involved in the question you
observe.

And if someone who believes would talk about "false religiosity" I'd
get the uncanny feeling that he might believe he's got the right one.


> On Aug 16, 2006, at 9:45 PM, Otto wrote:
>
> of which direction?
>
> 2006/8/17, Keith McMullen <keithsz at mac.com>:
> > Spoken like a true fundamentalist.
> >
> > On Aug 16, 2006, at 9:16 PM, Otto wrote:
> >
> > Only a true atheist can distinguish between right or false
> > religiosity. All the others aren't objective.
> >
>
>