AtD blurb - "false" religiosity?

[Steven]

	Yes, but what would the value of that objectivity be?  I don't think  
the position of not taking a position is really going to settle any  
specific claim.

	Steve


On Aug 17, 2006, at 1:03 AM, jd wrote:

> Wouldn't an agnostic - neither believing nor disbelieving - be more  
> objective?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20060817/1b76855e/attachment.html>