AtD blurb - "false" religiosity?

[jd]

So you're saying that being equally open to both possibilities is
bais?  Or do you mean subjective as "taking place in a person's mind
rather than the external world" (from dictionary.com)?  I guess then,
that it is impossible in any way to rise above the subjective.  But
the way you say it makes it seem that it's impossible to make a true
statement, and I think the Academicians were torn apart by Augustine
quite some time ago....

On 8/17/06, Keith McMullen <keithsz at mac.com> wrote:
> Neither believing nor disbelieving is completely subjective.
>
> On Aug 16, 2006, at 10:03 PM, jd wrote:
>
> Wouldn't an agnostic - neither believing nor disbelieving - be more
> objective?
>
>