AtD blurb - "false" religiosity?

[Keith McMullen]

I've given up on "true statements" whether Augustine laid anyone to  
W.A.S.T.E. or not. I don't know shit, and I don't trust anyone who  
claims they know shit. And whatever "objectivity" is supposed to be,  
I've yet to see anything presented that is "objective" that someone  
else can't shoot down. Perhaps that makes me an agnostic, but I find  
Gnosticism more colorful and entertaining.


On Aug 16, 2006, at 10:37 PM, Otto wrote:

Surely true in general, but "neither believing nor disbelieving" looks
like a good starting point to think about the distinction between
deeply felt, "true" religiosity and "false" religiosity.