AtD blurb - "false" religiosity?

[jd]

I will say though... (again from dictionary.com)

# Of or having to do with a material object.
# Having actual existence or reality.
#

# Uninfluenced by emotions or personal prejudices: an objective
critic. See Synonyms at fair1.
# Based on observable phenomena; presented factually: an objective appraisal.

it would seem that atheism is objective in that truth behind religion
is not an observable phenomenon (but I suppose one could argue that
neither is the falsity behind religion).  I still prefer to think that
agnosticism is the way to go, though.

On 8/17/06, Otto <ottosell at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Surely true in general, but "neither believing nor disbelieving" looks
> like a good starting point to think about the distinction between
> deeply felt, "true" religiosity and "false" religiosity.
>
> 2006/8/17, Keith McMullen <keithsz at mac.com>:
> > Neither believing nor disbelieving is completely subjective.
> >
>