AtD / TRP / feminist type stuff

[terrance terrance]

>
>A 50-something,  non-literary woman,  reading it for the  first time in  
>2005 might not be affected in quite the same way.    So,  yes,  I found GR 
>to be "a bit"  sexist in parts.  Young women were sex objects while older 
>women were Moms and grandmas (were there women over 30 in GR?  - not a 
>complaint,  maybe they weren't appropriate to the plot or themes or 
>anything) .

Were there men in GR? Any characters we recognize as men? I don't think so.

I doubt that the Feminist readings of GR that argue for equal time on stage 
are worth very much.

There are no black people in Woody's films, no real white women in 
Morrison's fiction no good black men in Walker's books no non-police Irish 
in bugs bunny cartoons....

OK Clancey, take the boyz and surround the house.

_________________________________________________________________
>From photos to predictions, The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes has 
it all. http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/