Best novel of the quarter century
MalignD at aol.com
MalignD at aol.com
Tue May 23 16:30:50 CDT 2006
<< M&D is actually the only Pynchon I've not read. I got through 100 pages
and then classes got too busy and I had to put it down. Planning on giving it
a re-read this summer.
Do you have any specific points to make against it? And, as an aside, what
do you think of Vineland, which many people seem to consider his weakest? (Not
necessarily the people on this list mind you, but every time it's mentioned
somewhere it seems to be derided as his lesser work). >>
I'm exaggerating, calling it a turd, but I do think it was, when it appeared,
a profoundly disappointing book, an opinion I haven't changed with time.
Why this book from this writer? What I assusmed would be the central
metaphor, of searing a line across the continent, a Pynchonian idea certainly -- was
never realized in any way that soared or excited. Instead, pockets of good
writing, fleeting themes of interest, amidst hundreds of pages of comic set
pieces that are occasionally amusing, just as often embarrasingly unfunny. That
dreadful narrator Cherrycoke and those children; the set-up is so feeble. It's
like Uncle Remus, but that Joel Chandler Harris is way better at writing
dialect.. It's a novel a lit professor might write.
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list