Washington Post Review of AtD

[Ya Sam]

1. The fact that Michiko Kakutani sometimes reviews great authors doesn't 
make her a great reviewer, imho. She's alright. No more.
2. Self-confessed ignorance: I didn't know the subtlety of this division of 
labour: Daily Times, Sunday Times, so nobody will allow Kakutani to review 
the book for the Sunday Times?
3. No need to 'go back and read' her review of M&D (I'd rather  'go back 
'and re-read M&D), I've read it several times. It's not brilliant imho, but 
just like its author it's alright, no more.




>From: Toby G Levy <tobylevy at juno.com>
>To: takoitov at hotmail.com,pynchon-l at waste.org
>Subject: Re: Washington Post Review of AtD
>Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 16:30:50 -0500
>
>The great Michiko Kakutani (go back and read her review of M&D, it's
>brilliant) reviews for the DAILY New York Times.  T Coraghessan Boyle
>reviewed M&D in the Sunday New York Times.
>
>Toby
>
>On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:51:06 +0200 "Ya Sam" <takoitov at hotmail.com>
>writes:
> > Wild guess: Michiko Kakutani
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >I wonder what scholar will get to review it for the Sunday New
> > York
> > >Times?
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now!
> > http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
> >
> >
> >

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/